Skip to main content

The "International Federation of Consulting Engineers" or contracts are widely accepted and used, especially in the construction industry worldwide. These contracts provide a structured framework for managing projects, covering various aspects of an agreement, such as design, construction, and dispute resolution. One of the critical elements of the FIDIC contracts like most other standard contracts is the arbitration provision, which serves as a method to resolve contractual disputes efficiently and impartially. The aim of this essay is to provide a practical overview of arbitration under FIDIC contracts in a nutshell, discussing its significance, procedures, key considerations, risks, and alternative ways to avoid ending up in an unwanted arbitration process.


    I.      The Significance of Arbitration under FIDIC Contracts: 


Arbitration comprises a crucial role in FIDIC contracts as a preferred method of dispute resolution. Unlike litigation, which involves court proceedings, arbitration offers several advantages, including flexibility, expertise, providing a certain level of control and confidentiality. By incorporating arbitration clauses, FIDIC contracts provide parties with a fair and neutral forum to resolve their disputes, ensuring a more efficient and cost-effective resolution process.


However, before initiating arbitration under a FIDIC contract, several steps are typically to follow. These steps may vary depending on the characteristics of each contract and the relevant jurisdiction, yet, the following outline provides a general overview of the common pre-arbitration procedures:


a)     Attempt to Negotiate and try to reach an Amicable Settlement: The parties involved in a dispute are encouraged to engage in negotiations and attempts at reaching an amicable settlement before resorting to arbitration. This could involve direct discussions, mediation, or other alternative dispute-resolution methods. FIDIC contracts often include provisions that require parties to pursue these options before initiating formal arbitration proceedings.

b)    Issue a "Notice of Dissatisfaction or Notice of Dispute": If negotiation attempts fail, or do not create a satisfactory outcome, the party seeking arbitration usually needs to provide written notice to the other party, commonly known as a "Notice of Dissatisfaction or Notice of Dispute". This notice formally communicates the existence of a dispute and the intention to proceed with arbitration. The FIDIC contract may specify the content and set timeframes for issuing this notice.

c)     Time for Amicable Settlement Efforts: After the notice is given, the parties may agree to a specific period, often referred to as a "cooling-off" or "standstill" period, during which they continue to explore possibilities for an amicable settlement. This time period allows for further negotiations or mediation, facilitating resolution without having to start a formal arbitration process.

d)    Appointment of Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) or as described in recent versions of FIDIC contracts, Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB): Certain FIDIC contracts incorporate a Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB) mechanism. If this mechanism is included, parties may need to submit the dispute to the DAAB for its decision or recommendation before proceeding to arbitration. The DAAB's decision is often binding, subject to any procedural defaults or any possible errors, and the right of either party to challenge it in arbitration if they are dissatisfied with the DAAB's decision. In that case, the dissatisfied party with the decision of DAAB must issue a notification to the DAAB and the other party a so-called "Notice of Dissatisfaction with the Decision of DAAB", after the parties still have another period to reach an Amicable Agreement. If the efforts are unsuccessful and No agreement has been reached, the next stop would be arbitration.

e)    Notice of Intention to Commence Arbitration: If the dispute remains unresolved, the party wishing to initiate arbitration must provide a formal written notice to the other party, commonly known as a "Notice of Intention to Commence Arbitration". This notice typically outlines; i) the details of the dispute, ii) identifies the claims being made, iii) asserts the party's intention to proceed with arbitration. The FIDIC contract may specify the content and timeframes for issuing such notice.


However, it is crucial to thoughtfully review all specific provisions in the FIDIC contract regarding pre-arbitration procedures before taking any further steps toward any arbitration, as they may vary between different editions and types of arrangements. Adhering to these pre-arbitration steps is essential to ensure compliance with contractual requirements and to promote a fair and structured dispute resolution process.


   II.      Arbitration Procedures under FIDIC Contracts: 


a)     Initiation of Arbitration: When a dispute arises between parties under a FIDIC contract, the party wishing to commence arbitration must follow the contractual provisions stipulated in the contract. Usually, this involves issuing a "Notice of Dissatisfaction or a Notice of Dispute", triggering the arbitration process.

b)    Appointment of Arbitrators: FIDIC contracts often include provisions specifying the appointment of arbitrators. The parties may agree on a sole arbitrator or a panel of three arbitrators. The selection of arbitrators must consider their expertise, impartiality, and suitability for the specific dispute.

c)     Arbitration Proceedings: FIDIC contracts usually allow parties to choose the rules governing the arbitration proceedings, such as those provided by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR). However, most of the FIDIC contracts in the Netherlands propose arbitration according to the Rules of the Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI). These rules outline procedural aspects, including the exchange of statements of claim and defense, evidentiary requirements, and the conduct of hearings.

d)    Arbitral Awards: Once the arbitration proceedings are concluded, the arbitral tribunal issues an award, which is legally binding on the parties. The award includes a decision on the dispute, the rationale behind the decision, and any remedies or damages awarded.


  III.      Key Considerations in Arbitration under FIDIC Contracts: 


a)     Time and Cost Efficiency: Arbitration under FIDIC contracts is generally faster and more cost effective than traditional litigation. The parties have more control over the process, including selecting arbitrators with expertise in construction disputes, avoiding lengthy court procedures, and streamlining evidence exchange and hearings.

b)    Expertise and Neutrality: FIDIC contracts often stipulate the appointment of arbitrators with specialized knowledge in construction law and industry practices. This ensures that the disputes are resolved by experts who understand the technical and legal complexities involved, enhancing the quality and reliability of the decisions.

c)     Confidentiality: Unlike court proceedings, arbitration provides a level of confidentiality that is highly valued in commercial disputes. Confidentiality safeguards sensitive information, protecting the reputation and business interests of the parties involved by not revealing delicate information to the public.

d)    Enforceability of Awards: Arbitral awards rendered under FIDIC contracts benefit from the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This international treaty facilitates the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in over 160 countries, ensuring that the parties can seek enforcement remedies globally.


Arbitration takes a crucial place in the domain of contracts under FIDIC, offering an effective and preferred method of dispute resolution for most agreements, especially for complex and multidisciplinary construction projects. In other words, by agreeing on arbitration clauses, FIDIC contracts can provide parties with practical, cost-effective, and confidential tools to resolve disputes. The structured procedures, emphasis on expertise and impartiality, and the enforceability of awards make arbitration an essential part of FIDIC contracts, providing reassurance for a fair and efficient dispute litigation method for the projects, especially within the construction industry.


  IV.      The potential risks associated with the arbitration proceeding under FIDIC:


While arbitration under FIDIC contracts offers several advantages, as with any other dispute resolution proceeding, there might be also potential risks associated with initiating arbitration, therefore, before deciding to start an arbitration proceeding all aspects of any dispute resolution should be thoughtfully considered and investigated. It is crucial to be aware of all possible risks before deciding to proceed with any formal arbitration. A few potential risks are listed below:


a)     Cost: Arbitration proceedings can sometimes involve significant costs, including arbitrator fees, legal representation fees, expert witness fees, administrative expenses, translation fees, travel expenses, and other related costs. The parties involved must fully bear these costs, which can sometimes be substantial, particularly in complex cases such as disputes regarding construction agreements. It is therefore essential to carefully consider the financial implications and weigh them against the potential benefits of arbitration.

b)    Time: Although arbitration is generally faster than traditional litigation, however, it can still be a time-consuming process. The duration of arbitration proceedings can vary depending on factors such as the complexity of the dispute, the availability of arbitrators, and the cooperation of the parties involved. Parties should be prepared for a potentially lengthy process, which may delay the resolution of the dispute and the progress of the construction project.

c)     Limited Appellate Rights: Arbitral awards are typically final and binding, with limited options for appeal. Unlike litigation, where parties have the opportunity to appeal unfavorable court decisions, arbitral awards are generally subject to very limited review by the courts. Once an award is issued, it can be challenging to overturn or modify. Parties should carefully consider the implications of limited appellate rights before proceeding with arbitration.

d)    Uncertainty of Outcome: The outcome of arbitration as of any alternative litigation method is uncertain, as it depends on the arbitrator's interpretation of the facts, evidence, applicable law, and all other related events. There is no guarantee that the decision will align with the expectations or desired outcome of either party. The arbitrator's decision may not fully resolve the dispute or may result in an outcome that is less favorable than anticipated. Parties should carefully assess the strengths and weaknesses of their case and consider the potential risks associated with the uncertainty of the outcome.

e)    Difficulty in Enforcing Awards: While arbitral awards are generally enforceable under international conventions, such as the New York Convention, it might be challenging when seeking enforcement in certain jurisdictions. Enforcement proceedings may be complex and time-consuming, particularly if the losing party resists compliance with the award. Parties should evaluate the enforceability of awards in the jurisdictions related to the location of construction projects to ensure the effectiveness of the arbitration process.


   V.      Alternative methods:


When faced with a dispute under a FIDIC contract, parties can consider various alternative dispute resolution methods as alternatives to arbitration. These alternatives offer different approaches to resolving conflicts outside of the traditional court system. Some common alternatives are listed below:

a)     Negotiation: Negotiation is an informal and direct process where the parties involved in the dispute engage in discussions to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. It allows for open communication and can be a cost-effective and time-efficient method, particularly for less complex disputes. Negotiation gives parties the opportunity to preserve relationships and tailor solutions to their specific needs.

b)    Mediation: Mediation involves the assistance of a neutral third-party mediator who facilitates negotiations between the parties to help them find a mutually agreeable solution. The mediator does not make binding decisions but assists in facilitating communication, exploring options, and guiding the parties toward achieving a resolution. Mediation is a voluntary process that allows for creative problem-solving and maintains more significant control over the outcome.

c)     Expert Determination: Expert determination involves referring specific technical or factual disputes to an independent expert for a binding decision. The expert, chosen for their expertise in the subject matter of the dispute, evaluates the evidence and provides a decision. This method is particularly suitable for disputes involving technical or specialized issues where an expert opinion can help resolve the matter efficiently.

d)    Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB): FIDIC contracts often include provisions for the establishment of a Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB). The DAAB consists of one or three impartial expert/s appointed to resolve disputes that arise during the project's execution. The DAAB's decision is typically binding, subject to review in arbitration if either party is dissatisfied. The DAAB process allows for a quick and expert resolution of disputes, promoting project continuity.

e)    Litigation: Litigation involves resolving disputes through the court's domestic legal system. While it is typically considered a last resort in FIDIC contracts, parties may still choose to pursue litigation if they believe it is the most appropriate method. However, litigation is a process that relies heavily on arguments and evidence which are presented to a judge or jury, thereupon, the court shall decide on a final ruling. However, litigation can be time-consuming, and costly, and provide less control over the procedure and outcome.


Conclusion: While arbitration in FIDIC contracts provides an efficient and structured method of resolving commercial disputes, it is crucial to consider the associated risks. Parties should carefully assess the potential costs, time implications, limited appellate rights, uncertainty of outcome, and enforcement challenges before deciding to initiate arbitration. Proper risk assessment and careful consideration of alternative dispute resolution options in order to mitigate any potential risks, can help parties make thoughtful decisions and choose the most suitable path for resolving their disputes under FIDIC contracts. However, it is also important for parties to carefully evaluate all related circumstances, characteristics of each dispute, their obligations under the contract, and contractual limitations when selecting an alternative method other than arbitration. The choice of any dispute resolution methods should be also based on elements such as time, cost, complexity, level of control during the process, completion percentage of the agreement, and the intention of the parties to maintain their business relationships, which can be very important especially when cooperation with these contractors or partners are important for the future projects.


To conclude, it is crucial to consult with an expert before making any decisions about whether to start a formal arbitration proceeding or any choice of other litigation alternatives. For more information and advice please contact us.